District Attorney Seeks to Overturn 4 Cases Tainted by LAPD Probe Charge against a fifth defendant is to be dropped. D.A. says the cases relied on information and evidence compromised by
two Rampart station officers
MATT LAIT, SCOTT GLOVER, Times Staff Writers
November 10, 1999 Los Angeles Times
Fax: 2132374712
Calling the LAPD's unfolding corruption scandal "potentially the
most important case we've ever had," Dist. Atty. Gil Garcetti on
Tuesday said his office will seek to overturn four criminal
convictions and dismiss charges against a fifth defendant because
their cases relied on tainted information and evidence from two
Rampart station officers.
Garcetti said he has assigned five prosecutors to work full time
on the corruption probe, which includes allegations that officers
assigned to Rampart's anti-gang CRASH unit planted evidence,
made false arrests and gave perjured testimony.
The alleged misconduct, the district attorney said, "goes right to
the heart of the criminal justice system."
The county's top prosecutor said his office will go to court today
to seek the release of Joseph Jones, who is serving an eight-year
state prison sentence stemming from a 1997 drug arrest.
Additionally, prosecutors will seek to
Overturn a weapons conviction against Miguel Hernandez,
41, who served eight months in prison and is out on parole.
Overturn a drug conviction against Manuel D. Perez, 31,
who was arrested with Jones, but fled before he was sentenced.
Perez was subsequently arrested in Texas and has since been
deported to Honduras.
Dismiss a 1997 drug charge against Wil Manzanare
Rodriguez, 30, who never showed up for his arraignment and
remains a fugitive.
Resentence Carlos Antonio Romero, 25, who received a
stiff prison sentence on a drug case based on a previous drug
conviction that authorities now believe was illegitimate. Romero,
authorities suspect, helped distribute drugs for former Los Angeles
Police Department Officer Rafael Perez--the central figure in the
corruption investigation.
All the cases set for action this week, in fact, involve alleged
misconduct by Perez and his former partner, Nino Durden. Perez,
who is cooperating with authorities to secure a lighter sentence for
his own cocaine theft convictions, has implicated himself and
Durden in a number of cases in which he says they planted
evidence, falsely arrested innocent people and then perjured
themselves in court.
In one case, Perez said, he and Durden shot an unarmed man in
1996 and then framed him for assaulting them. Javier Francisco
Ovando, now 22, was released from prison in September after
serving three years of a 23-year term. He has since filed a lawsuit
against the city.
Garcetti said he has lost confidence in cases involving Perez and
Durden and is being forced to drop them "in the interest of justice."
Sources add that prosecutors are examining the cases against as
many as 40 other convicted people whose trials may have been
tainted by the misconduct of Perez, Durden and others.
"Are we going to have three or four or five officers--or a dozen
officers, it's still too early for me to speculate," Garcetti said.
The district attorney said he is considering adding more
prosecutors to the investigation in addition to the five he has
assigned.
"We are aggressively pursuing every lead," he added. "This
investigation is absolutely critical to the credibility of the Los
Angeles Police Department, to every police agency and to the
criminal justice system as a whole."
In addition to scrutinizing cases involving Perez and Durden,
Garcetti said, prosecutors are examining cases involving all LAPD
officers who have been relieved of duty in connection with the
corruption investigation.
Prosecutors "have been instructed to examine every one of
those cases--and we're talking about [a] large number of
cases--and determine can you go forward without this officer's
testimony," Garcetti said. "If you can, fine; if you cannot, then you
either get a continuance or you dismiss the case."
Assistant Public Defender Robert Kalunian said he wishes the
lawyers in his office were afforded the same opportunity. He said
the district attorney's office has not provided the public defender
with a full list of the cases involving the testimony of officers alleged
to have committed misconduct. Rather, he said, prosecutors are
sending out letters to defendants' individual lawyers, some of whom
have since left the public defender's office.
Moreover, he said the district attorney has not given defense
attorneys the names of officers who are under suspicion of
misconduct, but who have not been formally accused.
"It's very frustrating," Kalunian said, adding that defense
attorneys need that information because it could have a bearing on
current cases working their way through the system.
One of the troubling aspects in the convictions that prosecutors
will seek to overturn is that all the defendants felt compelled to
plead guilty, instead of having a jury decide their fate. Defense
attorneys who have cross-examined Perez and Durden in court say
the two are among the most persuasive police witnesses they have
ever encountered. Even as their clients insisted on their innocence,
the defense lawyers advised them that they were better off making
a deal than risking an adverse verdict.
"It raises the specter obviously that they pleaded guilty to
something [even though] they were telling their lawyer, 'I'm not
guilty, I'm innocent,' " Garcetti said. "That raises a question for
everyone in the criminal justice system."
Kalunian agreed, saying that defendants are reluctant to take
their chances against a police officer, even when they know they
are telling the truth.
"If it's their word against a police officer they know they are
going to get convicted."
So far, the LAPD corruption probe has resulted in more than a
dozen officers being relieved of duty. Police officials expect more
officers to eventually get caught up in the scandal, which includes
allegations that officers were involved in improper shootings,
evidence planting, false arrests, witness intimidation, beatings, theft,
drug dealing and perjury.
One of the convictions prosecutors are seeking to overturn is
that of Carlos Antonio Romero, the brother of one of ex-Officer
Perez's girlfriends. Authorities believe that Romero and his sister,
Veronica Quesada, helped Perez sell some of the eight pounds of
cocaine he stole from LAPD facilities.
Ironically, Romero was arrested by LAPD detectives as they
questioned his sister about her relationship with Perez. He walked
into the apartment and was found to be carrying about a quarter
pound of cocaine in his pocket.
Garcetti said that conviction is untainted. The case prosecutors
say should be thrown out is a 1997 drug case in which Perez first
arrested Romero and then argued for leniency on his behalf, saying
that Romero had become a valuable informant.
Because of his conviction in the 1997 case, Romero received a
harsher sentence in the more recent case. Prosecutors will seek to
have him resentenced in that case without the previous conviction,
which should considerably lessen his eight-year sentence.
Copyright 1999 Los Angeles Times. All Rights Reserved
Comments to webmaster@drugsense.org
|