Skip to Content

MAP Drugnews

For-Profit Medical Companies Are Making Tons of Money Taking Poor People's Blood

Alternet - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 14:10
Click here for reuse options! Donors hope to get $30 a pop for their plasma, but sometimes they aren't even paid what they're promised.

Here’s another example of wealthy corporations sucking poor people dry—literally. While many good samaritans donate blood or bone marrow out of good will, others sell their bodily fluids on a biweekly basis just so they can make ends meet. Multimillion-dollar medical companies know this, and eagerly take advantage. The for-profit plasma donation industry has been quietly targeting poor Americans for decades, and sometimes, the donors aren’t even paid what they’re promised.

Plasma is used to manufacture medicines that help people with diseases like blood-clotting and immune deficiency disorders. According to ABC, 94 percent of the plasma used internationally comes from the U.S. Four out of 5 American plasma centers are located in poorer neighborhoods around the country, and are frequented mainly by poor people who need to supplement their income with the extra money they receive from donating. These donors receive $30 to $40 per donation on average. Compare that to the biotech companies that turn a profit from the plasma, estimated to be a $19.7 billion global industry.

Darryl Lorenzo Wellington, who wrote in a piece for the Atlantic that he donated plasma to pay his rent one month, explains how for-profit plasma companies are well aware they are making money off of poor donors. He writes, “the number of centers in the United States ballooned during the Great Recession, with 100 new centers opening and total donations leaping from 12.5 million in 2006 to more than 23 million in 2011.”

Some reports show that donors who frequent these for-profit plasma donation centers don’t end up being paid the amount they were promised.

At this point big business is stealing blood from the poor through plasma centers. They say they'll pay blood donors (in poor areas) but do so on debit cards with high fees. Actual blood money.

— Matt Stoller (@matthewstoller) December 8, 2017

As one plasma donor wrote in a complaint on RipoffReport:

“Bio life plasma Mankato pays $20 the first donation of the week and 50 for the second[. T]he problem is you can't get to all your money because of the car[d] that they use to pay you is in $10 increments which no ATMs around have so therefore you have to pay every time you use the stupid card when you happen to have a week where it's off also they charge You a monthly fee just for having the card therefore if you do get a $50 donation and are able to take it out for whatever reason you have overdraft on said card so therefore you can't get your money you have to use their card and guess what they make money off of it these people are bloodsucking vampires.”

Wellington confirms this unfair payment process: "'Plassers' [donors] receive payments on a special debit card that extracts a surcharge whenever they use it.”

It’s a cruel move for people who come to plasma donation centers as a last resort. One donor told ABC, “I donate specifically for the money because I work a minimum wage job. I work as a cashier and a stocker. I used to work as a repair technician for 14 bucks an hour, so I’m used to more than what I’m getting.”

Another donor in Kansas City who has a day job at Burger King said he makes donating a regular part of his routine. “I go Fridays and Sundays. Right arm I use Friday. Other I use Sunday. I switch up every time.”

Not everyone in the health industry is a fan of for-profit plasma. The Atlantic writes, “Hospitals, Red Cross units, and nonprofit agencies relying on voluntary donations reject the plasma center model because cash incentives for whole blood may give donors an incentive to lie [about their health histories], heightening risks of a tainted supply. Such risks are higher overall for whole blood, too.”

One expert on the subject finds the practice notably creepy. “For a majority of people, apparently, it’s relatively safe. We really don’t know the long-term effects because it’s a relatively new phenomenon," Roger Kobayashi, a clinical professor of immunology at UCLA, told ABC. However, he said that what used to be “a simple gift of life has now evolved into a multi-national, highly profitable corporate enterprise.”

“What was once an act of altruism has now evolved into an act of necessity or desperation,” Kobayashi said.

The Plasma Protein Therapeutics Association said in a statement to ABC News, "Source plasma donation is safe and is highly regulated. Donors must meet criteria defined by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration and voluntary industry standards. Healthy, committed donors are the foundation of plasma-derived therapies."

Yet if donors are desperate enough, there’s no way to monitor the possibility that they’ll lie about their medical history.

The plasma industry has a surprisingly shady history. In the '60s and '70s, the Atlantic writes, for-profit plasma companies used to source donors from prisons, sometimes paying them just $5 per donation to cut costs. As a result, many people got sick. According to the Atlantic, “Roughly 50 percent of American hemophiliacs contracted HIV from bad plasma-based pharmaceuticals (a much higher infection rate than that suffered by gay men at the time).”

One plasma donor told the Atlantic, “Hearing all this, I never want to walk into those places again.”

Click here for reuse options!  Related Stories
Categories: News Feeds

Looking Back: The Biggest Domestic Drug Policy Stories of the Past 20 Years

Alternet - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 12:26
Click here for reuse options! Progress has been made on a number of fronts, but the war on drugs still grinds on.

As the Drug War Chronicle marks the publication of its 1,000th issue (with yours truly having authored 863 of them going back to 2000), we reflect on what has changed and what hasn't in the past couple of decades. This piece recounts our domestic drug policy evolution in the US; a companion piece looks at the international picture.

A lot has happened. We've broken the back of marijuana prohibition, even if we haven't killed it yet; we've seen medical marijuana gain near-universal public acceptance; we've seen harm reduction begin to take hold; we've fought long and hard battles for sentencing reform—and even won some of them.

But it hasn't all been good. Since the Chronicle began life as The Week Online With DRCNet back in 1997, more than 30 million people have been arrested for drugs, with all the deleterious consequences a drug bust can bring, and despite all the advances, the drug war keeps on rolling. Serious progress has been made, but there's plenty of work left to do. 

Here are the biggest big-picture drug stories and trends of the past 20 years.

1. Medical Marijuana

It was November 1996, when California became the first state to legalize medical marijuana, five years after San Francisco became the first city in the country to pass a medical marijuana measure, thanks in large part to the efforts of activists who mobilized to make its use possible for AIDS patients. Two years later, Alaska, Oregon and Washington came on board, and three years after that, Hawaii became the first state to allow it through the legislative process. Now, 29 states, the District of Columbia, Guam and Puerto Rico allow for the use of medical marijuana, and public support for medical marijuana reaches stratospheric levels in polls.

But the battle isn't over. The federal government still refuses to officially recognize medical marijuana, potentially endangering the progress made so far, especially under the current administration, efforts to reschedule marijuana to reflect its medical uses remain thwarted, some of the more recent states to legalize medical marijuana have become perversely more restrictive, and in some of the more conservative states, lawmakers attempt to appease demands for medical marijuana legalization by passing extremely limited CBD-only laws.

2. Marijuana Legalization: In the War on Weed, Weed is Winning

Twenty years ago, pot wasn't legal anywhere, and Gallup had public support for legalization at a measly 25 percent. A lot has changed since then. It took repeated tries, but beginning in 2012, states started voting to free the weed, with Colorado and Washington leading the way, Alaska and DC coming on board in 2014, and California, Maine, Massachusetts, and Nevada joining the ranks last year. Now, about a fifth of the country has legalized weed, with more states lining up to do so next year, including most likely contenders Delaware, Michigan, New Jersey, and Vermont.

Now, Gallup has support for legalization at 64 percent nationwide, with even a slight majority (51 percent) of Republicans on board. The only demographic group still opposed to pot legalization is seniors, and they will be leaving the scene soon enough. Again, the battle is by no means over. Marijuana remains illegal under federal law, and congressional efforts to change that have gone nowhere so far. But it seems like marijuana has won the cultural war, and the rest is just cleaning up what's left of the pot prohibition mess.

3. Marijuana, Inc.: Rise of an Industry

State-legal marijuana is already a $10 billion dollar a year industry, and that's before California goes online next month. It's gone from outlaws and hippie farmers in the redwoods to sharp-eyed business hustlers, circling venture capitalists, would-be monopolists, and assorted hangers-on, from accountants, lawyers, and publicists to security and systems mavens, market analysts, and the ever-expanding industry press.

These people all have direct pecuniary interests in legal marijuana, and, thanks to profits from the golden weed, the means to protect them. Marijuana money is starting to flow into political campaigns and marijuana business interests organize to make sure they will continue to be able to profit from pot.

Having a legal industry with the wherewithal to throw its weight around a bit is generally, but not entirely, a good thing. To the degree that the marijuana industry is able to act like a normal industry, it will act like a normal industry, and that means sometimes the interests of industry sectors may diverge from the interests of marijuana consumers. The industry or some parts of it may complain, for instance, of the regulatory burden of contaminant testing, while consumers have an interest in knowing the pot they smoke isn't poisoned.

And getting rich off weed is a long way from the justice-based demand that people not be harassed, arrested, and imprisoned for using it. Cannabis as capitalist commodity loses some of that outlaw cachet, some ineffable sense of hipster cool. But, hey, you're not going to jail for it anymore (at least in those legal states).

4. The Power of the People: The Key Role of the Initiative Process

The initiative and referendum process, which lets activists bypass state legislatures and put issues to a direct popular vote, has been criticized as anti-democratic because it allows special interests to use an apathetic public to advance their interests, as both car insurers and tobacco companies have attempted in California. It also gets criticized for writing laws without legislative input.

But like any political tool, it can be used for good or ill, and when it comes to drug reform, it has been absolutely critical. When legislatures refuse to lead, or even follow, as has been the case with many aspects of drug policy, the initiative process becomes the only effective recourse for making the political change we want. It was through the initiative process that California and other early states approved medical marijuana; it was five years later that Hawaii became the first state where the legislature acted. Similarly, with recreational marijuana legalization, every state that has legalized it so far has done it through the initiative process; in no state has it yet made its way through the legislature, although we're hoping that will change next year.

And it's not just marijuana. The initiative process has also been used successfully to pass sentencing reforms in California, and now activists are opening the next frontier, with initiatives being bruited in California and Oregon that would legalize psychedelic mushrooms.

The bad news: Only 24 states have the initiative process. The good news: The ones that do lead the way, setting an example for the others.

5. The Glaring Centrality of Race

It took Michelle Alexander's 2010 publication of The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness to put a fine point on it, but the centrality of race in the prosecution of the war on drugs has been painfully evident since at least the crack hysteria of the 1980s, if not going back even further to the Nixonian law-and-order demagoguery of the late 1960s and early '70s.

We've heard the numbers often enough: Blacks make up about 13 percent of the population and about 13 percent of drug users, but 29 percent of all drug arrests and 35 percent of those doing state prison time for drugs. And this racial disparity in drug law enforcement doesn't seem to be going away.

Neither is the impact racially biased drug law enforcement has on communities of color. Each parent behind bars leaves a family exploded and often impoverished, and each heavy-handed police action leaves a bitter aftertaste.

The drug war conveyor belt, feeding an endless number of black men and women into the half-life of prison, is clearly a key part of a system of racially oppressive policing that has led to eruptions from Ferguson to Baltimore. If we are going to begin to try to fix race relations in this country, the war on drugs is one of the key battlefronts. Thanks in part to Alexander's bestseller, civil rights organizations from the traditional to newer movements like Black Lives Matter have devoted increasing focus to criminal justice, including drug policy reform.

6. Harm Reduction Takes Hold

We don't think teenagers should be having sex, but we know they're going to, so we make condoms available to them so they can avoid unwanted pregnancies and STDs. That's harm reduction. So is providing clean needles to injection drug users to avoid the spread of disease, making opioid overdose drugs like naloxone widely available so a dosing error doesn't turn fatal, passing 911 Good Samaritan laws to encourage and OD victims' friends to call for help instead of run away, and providing a clean, well-lit place where drug users can shoot or smoke or snort their drugs under medical supervision and with access to social service referrals.

Two decades ago, the only harm reduction work going on was a handful of pioneering needle exchanges, thanks to folks like Dave Purchase at the North American Syringe Exchange Network (founded in 1988), and early activists faced harassment and persecution from local authorities. But it was the creation of the Harm Reduction Coalition in 1993 that really began to put the movement on the map.

In this century, harm reduction practices have gained ground steadily. Now, 33 states and DC allow needle exchange programs to operate40 states and DC have some form of 911 Good Samaritan laws, and every state in the county has now modified its laws to allow greater access to naloxone.

The next frontier for American drug war harm reduction is safe injection sites, and on the far horizon, opiate-assisted maintenance. There is not yet a single officially sanctioned operating safe injection in the country, but we are coming close in cities such as Seattle and San Francisco. And let's not forget drug decriminalization as a form of harm reduction. It should be the first step, but that's not the world we live in, yet.

7. Sentencing Fever Breaks

Beginning in the Reagan years and continuing for decades, the number of prisoners in America rose sharply and steadily, driven in large part by the war on drugs. The phenomenon gained America infamy as the world's biggest jailer, whether in raw numbers or per capita.

But by early in the century, the fever had broken. After gradually slowing rates of increases for several years, the number of state and federal prisoners peaked around 2007 and 2008 at just over 1.6 million. At the end of 2015, the last year for which data is available, the number of prisoners was 1.527 million, down 2 percent from the previous year. And even the federal prison system, which had continued to increase in size, saw a 14 percent decline in population that year.

But most drug war prisoners are state prisoners, and that's where sentencing reform have really begun to make a difference. States from California to Minnesota to Texas, among others, enacted a variety of measures to cut the prison population, in some cases because of more enlightened attitudes, but in other cases because it just cost too damned much money for fiscal conservatives.

Current US Attorney General Jeff Sessions would like very much to reverse this trend and is in a position to do some damage, for instance, by instructing federal prosecutors to pursue tough sentences and mandatory minimums in drug cases. But he is hampered by federal sentencing reforms passed in the Obama era. Sessions may be able to bump up the number of people behind bars only slightly; the greater danger is that his policies serve as an inspiration for similarly inclined conservatives in the states to try to roll back reforms there.

8. The Rise (and Fall) of Opioids

In 1996, Purdue Pharma introduced Oxycontin to the market. The powerful new pain reliever was pitched to doctors as not highly addictive by a high-pressure company sales force and became a tremendous market success, generating billions for the Sackler family, the owners of the company. Opioid prescriptions became more common, and for many patients, that was a good thing.

Purdue Pharma's marketing push coincided with a push by chronic pain advocates—patients, doctors and others—to ease prescribing restrictions that had kept many patients in feasibly treatable pain. And which in many cases still do: A 2011 report by the Institute of Medicine found that while "opioid prescriptions for chronic noncancer pain [in the US] have increased sharply ... [29 percent of primary care physicians and 16 percent of pain specialists report they prescribe opioids less often than they think appropriate because of concerns about regulatory repercussions." As the report noted, having more opioid prescriptions doesn't necessarily mean that "patients who really need opioids [are] able to get them."

While it's popular to blame doctors and Big Pharma for getting so many pain patients addicted to opioids, that explanation is a bit too facile. Many of the people strung out today were never patients, but instead obtained their pain pills on the black market. Through a perverse system of incentives, people on Medicaid could obtain the pills by prescription for next to nothing, then resell them for $40 or $60 apiece to people who wanted them. Some pain management practices were on the cutting edge of relieving pain for patients who needed the help. But others were little more than shady pill mills, popping up in places like Ohio, Kentucky and Florida that would become the epicenter of the opioid epidemic within a few years.

When the inevitable crackdowns on pain pill prescribing came, legitimate prescribers, of course, got caught in the crossfire sometimes, especially those who served the poor or the patients who in the worst chronic pain. Their being targeted, or others reining in their prescribing practices, left many patients in the lurch again. And the closure of pill mills left addicted people in the lurch. But there was plenty of heroin to make up for the missing pills the addicted used to take. Mexican farmers have been happy to grow opium poppies for the American market for decades, and Mexican drug trafficking organizations know how to get it to market.

The whole thing has been worsened by the arrival of fentanyl, a synthetic opioid dozens of times stronger than pure heroin, which seems to be coming mostly from rogue Chinese pharmaceutical labs (although the Mexicans appear to be getting in on the act now, too).

And now we have a drug overdose crisis like the country has never seen before, with around 60,000 people estimated to die from overdoses this year, most of them from opioids (by themselves or in combination with alcohol and/or other drugs). The crisis is inspiring both admirable harm reduction efforts and an execrable turn to harsher punishments, while making things harder again for many pain patients. While many argue that the gentler response to this epidemic is because the victims are mainly white, I would suggest that argument pays short shrift to all the years of hard work advocates and activists of all ethnicities have spent creating more enlightened drug policies.

9. Policing for Profit: The Never-Ending Fight to Rein in Asset Forfeiture

Twenty years ago, pressure was mounting in Washington over abuses of the federal civil asset forfeiture program, just as it is now. Back then, passage of the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act (CAFRA) of 2000 marked an important early victory in the fight to rein in what has tartly described as "policing for profit." It was shepherded through the house by then Judiciary Committee Chairman Rep. Henry Hyde, an Illinois Republican.

How times have changed. Now, with federal agents seizing billions of dollars each year through civil forfeiture proceedings and scandalous abuse after scandalous abuse pumping up the pressure for federal reform, the Republican attorney general is calling for more asset forfeiture. And Jeff Sessions isn't just calling for it; he has undone late Obama administration reforms aimed at reining in one of the sleaziest aspects of federal forfeiture, the Equitable Sharing program, although he is having problems getting Congress to go along.

In the years since CAFRA, a number of states have passed similar laws restricting civil asset forfeiture and directing that seized funds go into the general fund or other designated funds, such as education, but state and local police have been able to evade those laws via Equitable Sharing. Under that program, instead of seizing money under state law, they instead turn it over to the federal government, which then returns 80 percent of it to the law enforcement agency, not the general fund and not the schools.

This current setup, with its perverse incentives for police to evade state laws and pursue cash over crime, makes asset forfeiture reform a continuing battlefield at both the state and the federal levels. A number of reform bills are alive in the Congress, and year by year, more and more states pass laws limiting civil asset forfeiture or, even better, eliminating it and requiring a criminal conviction before forfeiture can proceed. Fourteen states have now done that, with the most recent being Connecticut, New Mexico and Nebraska. That leaves 36 to go.

10. Despite Everything, the Drug War Grinds On

We have seen tremendous progress in drug policy in the past 20 years, from the advent of the age of legal marijuana to the breaking of sentencing fever to the spread of harm reduction and the kinder, gentler treatment of the current wave of opioid users, but still, the drug war grinds on.

Pot may be legal in eight states, but that means it isn't in 42 others, and more than 600,000 people got arrested for it last year; down from a peak of nearly 800,000 in 2007, but still up by 75,000 or 12 percent over 2015.

It's the same story with overall drug arrests: While total drug arrest numbers peaked at just under 1.9 million a year in 2006 and 2007—just ahead of the peak in prison population—and had been trending downward ever since, they bumped up again last year to 1.57 million, a 5.6 percent increase over 2015.

There are more options for treatment or diversion out of jail or prison, but people are still getting arrested. Sentencing reforms mean some people won't do as much time as they did in the past, but people are still getting arrested. And the drug war industrial complex, with all its institutional inertia and self-interest, rolls on. If we want to actually end the drug war, we're going to have to stop arresting people for drugs. That would be a real paradigm shift.

Click here for reuse options!  Related Stories
Categories: News Feeds

Want to Celebrate Legal Cannabis in California? Consider a Weed and Wine Tour

Alternet - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 11:51
With recreational use legal in January, visitors can join trips matching cannabis with the more established grape-based legal high of the region.

The wine was pale garnet, with notes of smoke and blackberry giving way to a lingering, slightly tart, finish. One sip sent my head spinning.

But then this particular vintage was more potent than your usual Californian red. The grenache, from Know Label wines in Arroyo Grande on the central coast, is infused with cannabis flowers.

Plastic cups of wine were passed around along with joints as our party bus chugged over the Golden Gate bridge. Tupac’s California Love oozed from the speakers into an atmosphere as foggy as a San Francisco morning.

It was the first tour combining wine and weed in California, and the brainchild of Heidi Keyes and Michael Eymer, who run Colorado-based Cannabis Tours. This tour will officially launch in early 2018, when recreational cannabis use becomes legal in many areas of the state. Until then, a medical marijuana card is needed. But the new law means even international visitors will be able to buy cannabis, opening up a new world of tourism possibilities.

“There are so many other ways to use cannabis than to smoke it,” said Keyes, marijuana-leaf earrings jangling. “I think wine and weed can be a great combination in the right quantities.”

Others are following suit. Jordan Lichman, co-founder of Sea of Green Tours, is planning winemaker dinners in Sonoma, with “California cuisine, top wines and cannabis brands”.

Lisa Rogovin, who founded Edible Excursions food tours, has just launched a Curious Cannabis Salon, showcasing various high-end edible cannabis products in San Francisco.

Our tour began at the Oakland Cannabis Creative with a “mocktail” demonstration. Looking like a hipster let loose in a laboratory, bow-tied Andrew Mieure expertly sprinkled and pipetted various doses and strains into spiced apple drinks. His Denver-based company, Top Shelf Budtending, caters for private events, promoting “classy cannabis” and responsible use.

“You should ideally smoke before you drink,” said Mieure. He was on hand throughout the trip with tinctures and sniffing oils “to bring people back” if they got too high. “Alcohol acts as a muscle relaxant, so the cannabis absorbs quicker into your bloodstream.”

The tour dropped in at the Betty Project, a San Francisco grow facility. Clutching glasses of sparkling (non-infused) wine, we peeped at plants bathing in chartreuse-green lights. Aromas of sage, eucalyptus and lemon verbena wafted from the drying room.

Our last stop was Donkey & Goat Winery in Berkeley, north of San Francisco. They don’t serve “green” wine – as cannabis-infused varieties are known – only red, white and orange.

Gloria, on the tour with her husband, sipped contentedly from a glass of pinot gris and nibbled on a breadstick: “Wine, cheese and weed. How can you complain?”

Visitors shouldn’t get the impression that from 1 January cannabis sales will be legal throughout the state: many city authorities have not yet agreed to issue licences, and Fresno and various counties have banned sales.

As we got back on the bus, Keyes surveyed the sea of serene faces. Some slumped in their seats, half dozing. Others mainlined Doritos or stared, button-eyed, as San Francisco’s skyline soared past the windows.

“If this was just a drinking tour, people would be wasted and throwing up or fighting by now,” said Keyes. Eyes shining, she added: “I mean, I love wine – and I love weed. It’s perfect.”

• The Wine and Weed tour costs $99pp,

 Related Stories
Categories: News Feeds

Police should not stop and search when they smell cannabis, says official guidance -

Google - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 11:09

Police should not stop and search when they smell cannabis, says official guidance
While being caught in possession of the Class B drug can result in a five year prison sentence, police are being advised to walk away even if they strongly suspect someone may have been using the substance. The official guidance was issued by the ...
Row over 'smell of cannabis' police stops - BBC News - BBC.comBBC News
Police shouldn't stop and search people just because they can smell cannabis, says reportThe Independent
Should the police stop and search you just because they smell cannabis? They're being told NOT toManchester Evening News
Criminal Justice Inspectorates
all 53 news articles »
Categories: News Feeds

Marijuana Is The Next Big Investment, But Here's Why Most Investors Will Have To Wait - Forbes

Google - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 07:07


Marijuana Is The Next Big Investment, But Here's Why Most Investors Will Have To Wait
Silicon Valley has been funneling capital into the cannabis industry since the early stages of the legalization process, but this space remains closed to the average investor. The only way for individual investors to take advantage of the industry's 16 ...

Categories: News Feeds

Hydropothecary expansion vaults Gatineau firm into medical marijuana's big leagues - Ottawa Citizen

Google - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 05:04

Ottawa Citizen

Hydropothecary expansion vaults Gatineau firm into medical marijuana's big leagues
Ottawa Citizen
Hydropothecary's announcement that it will build a giant new greenhouse vaults the Gatineau company into the ranks of Canada's largest medical cannabis growers. It also means two of the top producers in the emerging industry are located within an hour ...
Gatineau marijuana company building $80M
Hydropothecary cannabis expansion plans to put it among top producers in CanadaCTV News
Hydropothecary CEO: Quebec targeting cannabis price of $7-8 per gramBNN

all 10 news articles »
Categories: News Feeds

FL: Cops: Woman parks in police chief's spot while smoking pot -- WSVN 7News - Miami News, Weather, Sports - Fort Lauderdale

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:59 (US) Sports ! Fort Lauderdale Cops: Woman parks in police chiefb s spot while smoking pot (AP) b Authorities say a woman arriving at a Long Island court to answer a marijuana possession summons was smoking pot when she parked her vehicle in the local police chiefb s spot. (Tue Dec 12 19:59:22 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

OH: Spurned for Wilmington site, medical marijuana applicant pushes new pot issue - Wilmington News Journal

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:45 (US) Level 2-size medicinal marijuana growing facility in Wilmington was approved last month by the Ohio Department of Commerce. (Tue Dec 12 18:45:51 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

OH: Spurned medical marijuana applicant pushes new pot issue - Urbana Daily Citizen

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:43 (US) A high-profile proponent of marijuana legalization who was spurned as an applicant for a medical marijuana grower&#8217. (Tue Dec 12 18:43:49 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

OH: Trial continued for WCH man charged with abduction - The Record Herald

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:36 (US) Fayette County Prosecutor Jess Weade said the parties are waiting for the lab results from alleged methamphetamine and said case discovery will be complete once the lab results return. (Tue Dec 12 18:36:31 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

FL: Opioid commission makes an anti-marijuana argument - MyPanhandle

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:35 (US) "There is a lack of sophisticated outcome data on dose. Which was released with the commission's final report. Who was among several officials to speak at the meeting. Some experts say the commission's fixation on marijuana was bizarre and troubling. "I was surprised to see negative language about marijuana in the opioid report. (Tue Dec 12 19:35:37 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

CANADA: Road trip ended in Quinte Detention Centre - The Kingston Whig-Standard

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:20 (Canada) Price spent an uncomfortable three weeks in Quinte Detention Centre before pleading guilty in Kingston's Ontario Court of Justice to charges of possessing a 12-gauge shotgun without a permit and more than a kilogram of marijuana for the purpose of trafficking. ... (Tue Dec 12 02:20:57 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

CANADA: Provinces agree to new 75-25 pot tax split - The Kingston Whig-Standard

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:20 (Canada) A portion of which will be meted out to cities and towns to help them defray the cost of making pot legal across Canada. (Tue Dec 12 02:20:57 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

CANADA: For a farmer, growing marijuana is just like growing any other plant - Business - The Journal Pioneer

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:19 (US) Growing marijuana is just like growing any other plant ! Business ! The Journal Pioneer For a farmer. Growing marijuana is just like growing any other plant Edwin Jewell. (Tue Dec 12 02:19:45 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

CANADA: policy section - The Hill Times - The Hill Times

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:17 (US) Taxing medical cannabis hurts vulnerable patients The government recently announced that not only will the sales tax on medical cannabis continue. (Tue Dec 12 02:17:37 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

CANADA: Protecting health and safety top priority on legalizing cannabis, says Grit MP Serre - The Hill Times - The Hill Times

Bot - Cannabis - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:17 (US) Protecting health and safety top priority on legalizing cannabis, says Grit MP SerrC) - The Hill Times Protecting health and safety top priority on legalizing cannabis, says Grit MP SerrC) LEGALIZING OF MARIJUANA ... (Tue Dec 12 02:17:37 2017 PST)
Categories: News Feeds

CANADA: policy section - The Hill Times - The Hill Times

Drug News Bot - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:17 (US) Taxing medical cannabis hurts vulnerable patients The government recently announced that not only will the sales tax on medical cannabis continue. (Tue Dec 12 02:17:37 2017 PST) [$drug_related(100%), $drugwar_propaganda(65%), $propaganda_theme2(50%), $propaganda_theme3(65%), $propaganda_theme5(50%), $illegal_drugs(100%), $plants(100%), $intoxicant(100%), $medical_cannabis(100%), $cannabis(100%), $youth(50%)]
Categories: News Feeds

CANADA: Protecting health and safety top priority on legalizing cannabis, says Grit MP Serre - The Hill Times - The Hill Times

Drug News Bot - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:17 (US) Protecting health and safety top priority on legalizing cannabis, says Grit MP SerrC) - The Hill Times Protecting health and safety top priority on legalizing cannabis, says Grit MP SerrC) LEGALIZING OF MARIJUANA ... (Tue Dec 12 02:17:37 2017 PST) [$drug_related(100%), $drugwar_propaganda(98%), $propaganda_theme1(55%), $propaganda_theme2(70%), $propaganda_theme7(98%), $illegal_drugs(100%), $plants(100%), $intoxicant(100%), $cannabis(100%)]
Categories: News Feeds

[2]: Letters

Drug News Bot - Tue, 12/12/2017 - 00:16 (US) The Affordable Care Act has been a critical tool in our fight against the opioid epidemic, enabling 11,000 individuals with substance use disorders to get treatment for the first time. ... (Tue Dec 12 23:16:00 2017 PST) [$drug_related(100%), $drugwar_propaganda(95%), $propaganda_theme3(75%), $use_is_abuse(95%), $propaganda_theme4(95%), $propaganda_theme5(60%), $propaganda_theme6(65%), $illegal_drugs(100%), $opioid(100%), $narcotic(100%), $youth(60%), $school(100%)]
Categories: News Feeds